Category Archives: Social Media

Monitoring vs. Measurement – Article and a New Taxonomy need to choose platforms and tools

I co-wrote an article (part 1 of 3) with Cecilia Pineda Feret titled Social media monitoring and metrics: The definitive introduction at that was published Monday.   I’ll quote the article there and then add a few thoughts at the end of the post.

In the first of a three-part series, Cecilia Pineda Feret andMarshall Sponder provide a comprehensive rundown of tools, challenges and advice.

Perhaps you have heard of the terms ‘social media monitoring’ and ‘social media metrics’ or analytics as it is sometimes known. There are those who are still trying to figure out how social media fits into their company’s strategy and may think these terms are interchangeable.

If you fall into this category, fear not. Most of the world still thinks this way as well, as more and more companies are quickly realising the importance of implementing social media along with monitoring and metrics of activity on these platforms.

Why monitor or measure?
Why would anyone want to monitor or measure the activity that refers to their product or service or even concept? Is there too much noise to make any sense of what is said anyway?
When you monitor, you are keeping tabs on what is already out there as well as the results of your own or others’ activity. You are collecting the actual information that your research runs across in the form of words and images: tweets, blog posts, comments, photos, videos and audio podcasts.
When you measure you are counting, tracking, noticing patterns and trends within this information. In short, you analyse the results of what you have monitored in order to help you connect better with your customer. Your messaging, competitive analysis, community building, branding, product development, even through crowd sourcing, and countless other tactics you implement to run your business effectively all benefit from your monitoring and metrics, which serve as a source of ideas, an inspiration, and a guide.
Murray Newlands is an international social media marketing expert and co-founder ofInfluence People Ltd the Social Media Monitoring events company. In his recently released e-book, “The Social Media Marketing Book,”  Murray lists eight simple reasons why you should care about monitoring. See his e-book for more detail:
  1. Understanding
  2. Marketing campaigns
  3. Market research
  4. Product development
  5. Competitor analysis
  6. Brand popularity
  7. Market sentiment
  8. Engagement
  9. Influence
  10. Return on investment
The definition of monitoring
As it pertains to social media, monitoring involves listening; listening to customers, potential customers, the competition’s customers, vendors, employees, anyone and anything that involves what you need to know about your business and how it works or should work. Monitoring is also a time intensive activity with can have significant overhead as the process requires human attention and intervention.
What exactly should we monitor?
Here are key areas of traditional enterprise research to monitor and measure:
  • PR effectiveness: Influencers activity and coverage of you and your topics.
  • Demand signals: Trends in new interests or products.
  • Brand strength: Types of mentions you get.
  • Product strengths & weaknesses: Specific feature comments, positive and negative.
  • Competitive position: How do you compare to your competitors. Where are you now? Where do you want to be?

It’s difficult to entirely separate monitoring and measurement; for example, the dashboards generated for the monitoring list above are used in measurement dashboards such as those referenced at (See for more details.)

You monitor whatever keywords are relevant to your area. For example, if your area is automobiles, what other words than the obvious would you search across the various platforms? Cars, automobiles, transportation, travel and so on. How about energy pricing? Would learning about how your customers view energy pricing be relevant to your design and marketing of your automobile or automobile related service?
If it would, then you travel down yet another road where you may want to examine alternative energy, the recession, travel-related cost saving methods and so on. The possibilities may seem unlimited, but you have the resources for a determined amount according to your budget, so you start with what you can measure.
You can monitor what certain target markets are saying about you or automobiles in general or in specific. Countless associations and organisation within those target markets exist whose communications are searchable. Is there a relevant fan club your Google research has uncovered? Why not monitor their Facebook page, their tweets on Twitter, and other sources of online contact with each other? Are these fans taking pictures of your product and posting to their Flickr account or another account?
The challenges of monitoring
As mentioned earlier in this article, monitoring involves more human effort, filtering, which needs to be set up, which of course entails time. It is often unstructured and continuously evolving. Obviously, the bigger the company or field, the more you are going to have to monitor.
The definition of measurement/metrics
Once you have a monitoring system set up, at a certain point you need to measure those results or you will go crazy collecting the information as it overflows your account, your inbox, and wherever else you have set up to receive reports.
You will be measuring instances of words and phrases mentioned, issues raised, comparisons of service or product, support or critique for a product or service or cause, levels of engagement or interaction with a brand, with others in a community or network, pass along rate (like when info goes viral).
The challenge of sentiment analysis as a metric
An area that is heavily debated is SENTIMENT ANALYSIS. Can we make a judgment on whether a person or community feels a certain way about a product or service based on words chosen? What happens when someone refers to a product SUCKING SUPREMELY and that product happens to be a vacuum cleaner? Are we to think of every single instance of an instance where a word can be taken another way, the wrong way or many ways and measured incorrectly? That is where the challenges lie.
In accounting we have numerous methods of assessing the value of goodwill. Now there’s a challenge, a challenge very similar to what we face in social media and measuring goals, objectives, and outcomes.
The challenge of customer engagement as a metric
If there is increasing engagement regarding a topic concerning your product or service, do we follow PT Barnum’s advice as long as they spell our name right? These days we need to be there before anything happens by listening and measuring and assessing the value of what we are listening to and then measuring because there is simply too much.
How do we know if what we are listening to is worth tracking? Many business people hear about Followers (Twitter) and Fans, or Likers if you prefer, (Facebook) and immediately focus on those numbers, increasing them and those related with them. However, in the end, is it really about those numbers? Or is it about the bottom line?
It’s about all of this and much, much more.
The challenges of measuring and monitoring social media
With social media it can’t be just about the bottom line, because too much is involved. Yes, the bottom line is what concerns investors, managers depending on bonuses, and money does make the world go round. But there are also intangibles to ‘measure’.
Therein is the heart of the challenge of metrics. You can only measure just so much. You can set up a dashboard, but you still need somebody to read it and digest it so they can apply the information.
To conclude part one of this three-part series on monitoring and measurement, we offer the wisdom of Gary Angel, the CTO and co-founder of the technical, headquartered in the California Bay area.
Steps to accurate measurement
Typically measurement is a multi-step process. Gary says it best in his Semphonic Blog:
  • Find a means to accurately measure (even if expensive and one-time) the uber-measure.
  • Create measurement around a set of sub-indicators that might be either causal or indicative.
  • Correlate the sub-indicators with the uber-measure.
  • Use a factor analysis to reduce the sub-indicator set and to identify combinations that represent key causal factors.
  • Track the relevant sub-indicators on an ongoing basis as your key performance indicators.
“In terms of social capital, uber-measures are things like brand awareness, brand value, customer satisfaction, consumer trust and loyalty. Sub-indicators are likely to be things like social mentions, brand searches, web site visits, online satisfaction scores, relationship events (like registration), etc.”
“You’ll likely find that accurate assessment of the uber-measures requires professional primary research. Measurement of sub-indicators is likely to come from a whole grab bag of systems including web analytics tools, social monitoring tools, competitive landscaping tools and search monitoring tools.”
Gary warns that it is rare that companies take the intermediate and crucial steps of collecting these two items together and then analyzing them to create a measurement framework that might work on a going forward basis.
“But when it comes to measuring social media, understanding that ROI isn’t necessarily the focus can dramatically change your approach to measurement and open up powerful measurement directions that don’t directly yield an ROI but do yield powerful indications of how successful your efforts really are.”
Remember that when you are setting up a social media monitoring tool your focus is on listening and responding. Filtering out noise comes later. Here you want to be as inclusive as possible and let the human reader do the filtering.
For reporting (measurement) nobody is reading the actual posts and filtering them, because they are being aggregated up into mentions and sentiment numbers, and if there is noise that you have let filter through, then that noise shows in the numbers.
When you setup a profile, you need to review your info to ensure that garbage or noise doesn’t increasingly creep into your data stream. Maintaining it never really stops. For pure listening and responding once you setup a profile, you rarely really need to tune it.

In many ways, the value of monitoring and measurement will depend on the correct setup of the listening platforms and the interoperability of various tools used to create reports and insights; Marshall Sponder deals with this subject in depth in his book Social Media Analytics, to be published by McGraw Hill on August 19th, 2011 (September 2011 in the UK).
See for more details.
For another excellent source of information about social media metrics check out the presentation by Ytzik Aranov, COO, Social2B made recently during Social Media Week in New York at:
Here is a listing of services that you may use for monitoring or measuring. Many of the tools do both, however.
Listening/monitoring tools:
Measuring tools
More resources on the topic of Measurement and Monitoring:
Various meetups such as:
Blogs to subscribe to:
Part two of the three part series will provide more help on how to deal with monitoring and measurement by looking at case studies from leading social media analytics tool companies.
Cecilia Pineda Feret, a Digital Marketing Strategist, provides online and social media strategy, implementation, and training to individuals and organizations. As a connector of people, ideas, and technologies, she is always learning, and sharing, about the next new thing in emerging digital communications. Cecilia also co-produces NY Data Stories. Follow her on Twitter: @cecipf and Tumblr cecipf

Marshall Sponder is the founder of Webmetricsguru.coman industry blog about Web AnalyticsSocial Media and Search Marketing. He also writes a monthly column on helping businesses to leverage online marketing technologies successfully in a challenging economy. Marshall maintains his own Analytics Consultancy, Now-Seo, working with small to large marketing agencies. He is also producing NY Data Stories , events offering networking and analysis of business metrics. Follow him on Twitter:@webmetricsguru
Thoughts about the article:
When writing an article like this, the sum of two heads is often better than one; I find there are others who can often articulate my ideas better than I can, often improving on them which is what happened here.
I was talking with a good friend yesterday about the differences with their platform (yes, we’re talking about a vendor platform) and rolling your own, or just making the wrong choices … and where that can lead us … and you don’t want to know just how bad the outcome of choosing wrong can be … but it can be a horror show.
And I think a lot times, that’s what happens.    For example, there are more and more books coming out on Social Media everyday, but I don’t know of any that disimbiguates the choices one has to make as much as mine will.
One other thing – and I want to write a whole post on how to compare Social Media tools  but I’ll briefly mention it here by citing a post by Liza Sperling who posted this at –

How to: Evaluate and Compare Social Media Tools

Here are some parts of the post that are really fantastic – and play into my article with Cecilia Pineda Feret on Monitoring and Measurement (above).  I think along with all the ideas we’re communicating here, the need for a better way to describe what platforms and tools do are needed – and that’s one thing that’s making it even harder to make the right choices – the choices my book is all about…


….. It’s clear that this nascent space is lacking the taxonomy necessary to group and define tools’ core functionality. Buzzwords like “dashboard” and “platform” are used to describe any tool with data and a graph or two. As a result, social business professionals with a mandate to evaluate and select a “tool” often end up comparing a wrench to a hammer.

….There are hundreds of social media tools out there vying for your attention, but few do a great job of defining what they actually do and do not do. Some are similar to one another and compete with each other, while others have zero overlap and can supplement each other. Of course determining which tools are right for you requires a clear definition of your objectives, but without knowing which tools do what it is impossible to know which tools will meet those objectives.

By the way, my book on Social Media Analytics addresses this issue – unfortunately, it’s just going to be published in August this year – but here is what Lisa says is the breakdown –

Social Medial Monitoring (SMM) tools, often called listening platforms, are where most social media strategies begin – monitoring and tracking mentions of your brand, products, competitors and industry issues. SMM tools offer countless ways to analyze, measure, display and report findings…The features vary by vendor as does cost, so one typically selects one SMM solution or provider and supplements it with tools in other categories.

Social Customer Relationship Management (SCRM) tools aggregate dozens of types of information from multiple social networks to give users the most complete view possible of each customer.

  • Nimble
  • BantamLive
  • Blue Camroo
  • Sugar CRM
  • Beez Box
  • JitterJam
  • Gist
  • Toucan
  • Postling
  • The Social Whale
  • SalesForce
  • Social Media Specialized (SMS) tools fall into a handful of buckets.  These tools are not stand alone tools or comprehensive platforms, but specialized tools focused on on analyzing and optimizing one aspect of your social media efforts.  The intent is to use these tools to supplement, not replace, other tools. Some of these tools are available on SMM or SME platforms, for example, you can view Klout scores within Seesmic Desktop. These tools can be broken down into the following categories:

    Social Media Content Management (SMCM) tools facilitate the creation, distribution, optimization and management of social media content.  Each tool facilitates at least one specific activity.  For example, Timely posts your tweets at a future time to achieve the most reach.


    By the way, I’m also looking at Spiril16 and shall have an analysis on it, shortly.

    Enhanced by Zemanta

    51% of those reached by a company on Twitter are more likely to do business with you.

    Interesting statistic and a friend of mine gave me a link to this info-graphic earlier this week.  Do you believe the first point (51% of those reached by a company on Twitter are more likely to do business with you)?

    Web Journal June 13th – 19th 2010 plus what are the real motivators to decision making

    First, the basic stuff – a report that small businesses are collapsing like wild fire around the Gulf of Mexico due to the Gulf Oil Spill that was largely caused by British Petroleum – while this is not unexpected – it’s also grimly illuminating.  Then another story we probably already forgot but was big news early this week that the Pentagon ‘Discovers’ Huge Lithium Deposit in Afghanistan.

    When I heard that I immediately wondered how long we really knew this and why we were getting this information just now – draw your own conclusions – mine are that we are building the case for a long and protracted war in Afghanistan, and now the West has a reason for that war – though, to be honest with you – if the world economy continues to be depressed, as it is, we’ll have little use for those Lithium under those mountains (unless we’re all manic/depressive).   And if we are all collectively end up  building up the world economy by making Afghanistan into a giant slice of  Swiss Cheese as the Taliban and Warlords are taking sniper shots at miners – welcome to the 21st century!

    Then again, maybe what we really need is Personal Fuel Cells  thaOffer Pocket-Sized Power from Water (Video) while digging all those holes – or powering our mobile devices.

    Then again – we still need to carry water or be nearby it – but that’s usually not a problem if your in New York or some other place where there is plenty of water but not a power outlet you can get to – Ha!

    But if we’re going to chop of Afghanistan in some future war – or an expansion of this one – as the data above might suggest – we’ll need plenty of charities to clean up the damage – and one platform is evolving that looks quite promising – Nadanu’s Fundraising Platform Streamlines E-Giving.

    Think I could really get into dropping virtual pennies into the pot!

    OutSpoken Media came up with 52 Questions To Ask When Hiring A Social Media Company many I thought were quite good and could in fact be used to create a working doc, offering or case study if they were answered – of course they’d be your answers.   And then, last week Trackur Launches White-Labeled Social Media Tracking for just $297!  - but this week – we already forgot that and don’t care anymore.   Fact of the matter – a lot of companies might want to offer Social Media Monitoring but don’t want to go with Radian6 or Sysomos – they want something a bit “cheaper” and I guess Andy Beal figured he’d go after those people – and maybe he’s right.  We’ll see.  BTW, some news that Jive Software just bought access to the entire Twitter Firehose – ha!

    Gary Angel‘s post on Further Thoughts on Data Warehousing was one of the best he’s written and told me why Public Relations might want to invest in a Data Warehouse approach instead of ad-hoc reports.   Many of the questions that are asked of me, at the end of the day, can’t be answered by Web Analytics or Social Monitoring, or Internal Customer Data – by themselves – and Gary makes a good argument that if you need to answer issues revolving around velocity and interest, and even sentiment –  you may want to build you own warehouse – except the amount of money and resources spent will be gigantic – but then – I think this may well be  the investment everyone is “resisting” but really needs to make – at least, those who win in the long run – they need to make that investment – I will say no more abut this subject.  Read Gary Angel’s post and see if you agree with me.

    The big news this week was Coremetrics, a leading Web Analytics (and Social Media monitoring?) firm was bought by IBM.  I haven’t really worked with Coremetrics since I left in late 2007 and I don’t know what they added since – but …. I know that Coremetrics bought IBM Surfaid 4 or 5 years ago and now IBM has bought Coremetrics to bring it all back home.   Also, most analytics platforms have added some Social Monitoring – if only as an after thoguht – but I haven’t heard of anything interesting there that Coremetrics is doing – but as far as IBM goes, the acquisition makes a lot of sense since their whole company is now wired up to Coremetrics – might as well own them!

    Also, the news that Twitter is allowing us to tag our tweets by location is interesting - though I haven’t tried it yet – I can imagine that this information will be collected by Social Media Monitoring platforms soon enough.  But for those people who want to justify Social Media as an investment for marketing purposes – look no further than a study that came out this week saying more than 20% of our collective online time is spent on Social Media – and I think that is a conservative number.     Also – Sysomos came out with a study that I find extremely interesting and I will attempt to build off of, around conferences – here’s the study.

    The full report can be found here.

    Meanwhile, a post by Paddy Moogan that appeared in JatiN’s blog was one of the best for link building I have ever read – and really tells you why you have to dig in and build relationships – and if your not willing to do that – then just go out and buy links – because it’s really down to either a combination of relationship building which is time consuming  – with some paid links possibly, or just go out and buy links if you can’t spend time building relationships – or just forget about SEO  – that is what it’s really become.  I suggest reading the entire post which is very long and very detailed and covers a lot of categories.

    Thought a post on How Facebook EdgeRank Affects Your Visibility would be intresting to read in detail as well. Here’s what the factors are:

    FacebookAs Jason Kincaid explains in EdgeRank: The Secret Sauce That Makes Facebook’s News Feed Tick on Tech Crunch, three factors influence the EdgeRank of your content:

    1. Relationship, i.e., your relationship with your potential audience as perceived by Facebook. The more you interact with Facebook users, the higher the EdgeRank of your posts, and the higher your posts appear on their walls. Facebook rewards you for building personal relationships. Invest time reading, commenting on and sharing other people’s content.
    2. Engagement, the extent to which people engage with your post. A strong interaction will drive up your Facebook Edge Rank. Of course, someone has to see your post and react to it in the first place. This can lead to a Catch-22 situation. If necessary, send a message to some of your good friends in order to get the ball rolling. By the way, the most engaging posts are status updates that ask questions.
    3. Time Elapsed – Over time your post loses EdgeRank, which makes room for newer posts to appear. No one post gets to hog the news, so keep your creative juices flowing.

    Getting to the “Lizard Brain”  – Seth Godin had a good post on it and in fact I wanted to end my post on this.  Earlier this week I spoke at the Corporate Social Media Summit and moderated a panel on Social Media Analytics (#csm10).  I threw out a statement that decisions are not made on metrics, logic or numbers overall, but inspired by something entirely different – base emotions – for the most part – that’s the disconnect I see between the metrics we supply – and the fact no one really makes a decision on metrics.

    Reading Paul Krugman today  – it’s obvious to me why he’s been 99% right on everything since I have been reading his column since 2001 – yet over and over – decision are made that are just dumb and stupid – read That ’30’s feeling – and then consider this -

    The way I look at this – Posturing by governments world wide – inspired partly by Germany to be “Strong” and austere by slashing aid to unemployed and aging populations – is essentially an emotional response by those groups to a global slump they don’t truly understand or want to deal with.

    As i said in my panel at #csm10 this week – no matter how many numbers you throw in front of people – just about every decision made by humans including strategy, campain and budgetary matters is based on emotion. Numbers are mainly for justification or confirmation of a decision already made or about to be.

    People generally don’t make deciosions on basis of metrics or the actual situation, and in this case – German Officials and US Republicians and Democratic moderates are not interested in the actual facts – metrics will not move them and Truth will not change their mind – because their minds were already made up based on their emotional response to a situation the world has no idea what to do.

    By the way – here’s a video of me taken right at the end of #CSM10 this week.

    Enhanced by Zemanta