Social Media Measurement - Analytics Metrics

Posted by Marshall on July 26, 2007 | Link It

Social Media Measurement Analytics and Metrics means different things depending on what your job is according to NetSavey's Nathan Gilliatt  who posted on Sorting out social media measurement :

"…Social media measurement has multiple competing definitions coming from the various specialties that have an interest in understanding social media."

Nathan Gilliatt brakes down Social Media Measurement Analytics to 4 distinct types:

    1. Measuring Online Audiences
    2. Tracking Social Media Content
    3. PR (Buzz)
    4. Market Research

I'd have to disagree with one point that's made here:

"…Advertising is the only application where standard metrics actually matter. Media and advertisers want a reliable ratings system for pricing and tracking online ad buys. Other applications need reliable data to generate KPIs, but diversity in sources and methods shouldn't be a problem."

While we might not be able to arrive at standard metrics yet, for a variety of reasons, we do need them and I don't think that many people really believe, or want to believe that standard metrics don't matter for most analytics.

In fact, part of what we're trying to achieve in the Social Media Committee of the Web Analytics Association, which I am the director of, is a set of standard definations for Social Media and how to measure it that we can make available to vendors - as a guide (that they can use, if they want to).

We had a meeting this week and are beginning work on the Social Media Standards Document - but it's just at the very beginning - and hopefully, it will take a life of it's own as committee members run with it.

By the way here's an excellent video on Social Media Measurement that features Eric T. Peterson and Jeremiah Owyang filmed last month in Portland.



4 Responses

These are the current comments for "Social Media Measurement - Analytics Metrics"

mdg
07/27/07 @ 4:06 am

Some related thoughts here.
http://wiredset.com/root/archives/008589.html



07/27/07 @ 10:02 am

Interesting. In the interview, Eric mentions that different companies may use different definitions of engagement, based on their specific situations. The framework is standardized, but the resulting metric is customized.

I would characterize the framework as an emerging best practice, and there’s plenty of reason to have everyone in the analytics space contributing to their refinement. It may be that most companies will end up with similar methods and metrics, anyway. But the metrics don’t need to be standardized, because except for buying and selling advertising, they’re used within a company. It doesn’t matter whether they’re using the same metrics and methodologies as other companies, because nobody’s going to compare the data.



07/27/07 @ 12:40 pm

Consumer Segmentation is now being measured by comScore Media Metrix by dividing audience into light, medium and heavy users.  It's fair to say that if you can segment your users by audience and get your analytics to track that segme…



07/28/07 @ 4:04 am

Nice video. It would be interesting to know Mr Peterson’s thoughts on different ‘Advertising rate cards’ based not only on the Visual appeal but also on the Engagement appeal of the ads on a website.



Post a Response

Name (required)

Email (required, not published)

Website (optional)

Note: The following tags are approved for comments on this blog:
<a href=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <del> <strong>