Visitor Engagement & ComScore

Posted by Marshall on October 20, 2008 | Link It

I’m excited Eric T. Peterson and Web Analytics Demystified, along with ComScore and Josh Chasin, figured out a way to overlay Web Analytics Demystified Visitor Engagement Score; this is big news.

I’m on my way to Emetrics Marketing Optimization Summit DC and writing this from my 3G IPhone using WordPress; I don’t have the ability to link to Eric T.Peterson’s post today, just now, but you can check it out for yourself at webanalyticsdemystified.com, if your interested.

Here’s the thing, I work with Web Analytics and ComScore Media Metrix, quite a lot, and have read Eric’s paper recently, so I have a seasoned opinion.

I think Engagement Scoring is going to be a big improvement for ComScore, though I hope it will be provided as part of ComScore’s core reports rather than being a new product that you have to pay extra for. Based on what information I can pull out of Eric’s post, today, I am inclined think the result will be the latter rather than the former.

Why?

Look, 4 of the 7 measures in his formula are used because the other 3 can’t be pulled out of ComScore’s Audience data, and of those the formula used, the base data is already present in any core report ComScore produces.

In his post, Peterson shows the caculated percentages for each engagement index, not the raw data and an example of how he applied his calculation. That’s what leads me to think the Engagement Score will be. Paid addition to standard reports once it’s offered, if it ever is offered (hope I am wrong on this one).

However, I do understand giving away everything valuable is also, not desirable. And, honestly,Engagement Scoring does add value, so thereis some justification for adding additional cost. Clearly, this is a philosophical issue, and I don’t know what the final form of this service will be, anyway.

But, I still think it would be unfair to tack on additional charges for calculations on data to arrive at an Engagement Score based on published and paid for data the subscriber already has.

Think of it this way, some Web Analytics Platforms, as of today, don’t give you “Bounce Rate” but it’s easy to calculate Bounce Rate based on a standard report, so why charge extra for it?

The 4 Engagement Percentages being presented in Eric Petetson’s post, that make up a property’s score aren’t much more complicated to calculate than Bounce rate is.

I think the Web Analytics Demystified Engagement Scoring of ComScore Reports, is a major advance for ComScore, but it needs to be free and offered as soon as possible.

As Eric Peterson noted, there are some features of Audience Measurement that confer a distinct advantage over Web Analytics, such as the Catogorization of web properties.

Peterson quickly came up with a loyal score for any ComScore site by dividing visits to a web property by the total visits to all web properties in the same category; it’s simple, but effective, and draws on data the Subscriber already has in a standard ComScore report, which means a subscriber can do the Loyalty Calculation for themselves, if they want.

I’m looking forward to speaking with Eric Peterson, and hopefully, Josh Chasin about the resarch being presented today, in person, at Emerrics Marketing Optimization Summit.

I want to add one more point, and this is directed more at ComScore; Data that a subscriber already gets in one format (or report) should be made freely available to a ComScore data subscriber in other forms, for no additional charge.

However, if data a ComScore Subscriber already gets is manipulated with additional data the Subscriber doesn’t have (hasn’t paid for) then ComScore, I feel, is well within their rights to repackage the data as a new product.

Examples where ComScore does not appear to be following my advice is their Cross Visiting reports, these are simply a recalulation of data a customer already paid for in the Core Reports.

On the other hand ComScore Segment Metrix adds considerable extra data to Core Reports, improving them; ComScore is entited to market Segment Metrix as an additional product because of all the additional information contained (unlocked, would be a better term).

So, from that point of view, Web Analytics Demystified Engagement scoring ought to be a free enhancement, a gift to ComScore Subscribers, who pay hand over fist for the ComScore offerings, in the first place.

What does Eric Peterson and his brand get out of it? More people know who he is, his brand spreads, which is, by all measures, a good thing.

And now my fingers tire and I’m almost in Washington DC now.

Hope there’s not too many typos and misspellings here, tried my best to avoid that.



Twistori and Web Analytics Wednesday in NYC

Posted by Marshall on April 30, 2008 | Link It

How are they connected (Twistori and Web Analytics Wednesday)?  They're not, in any obvious way - but I focused on both today - and wrote a post about how Twistori could be used as magnifying glass to examine sentiment at The Analytics Guru -

Twistori - good as it is, but better if it could be refined

Also - I'm going to hang out, right now, with other Web Analytics Professionals, including Eric Peterson, who's hosting the Web Analytics Wednesday here in Manhattan today over at Avenue A | Razorfish Office 19th floor in New York

Maybe I'll write about it later tonight - so busy lately - and I'll be in San Francisco on Sunday at Emetrics Summit (at the Palace Hotel) in case anyone is attending - please say hello. 

 

 



Is Web Analytics Easy or Hard - depends on who you talk to

Posted by Marshall on February 06, 2008 | Link It

Recently a  little tit for tat has been going on between Avanish Kaushak and Eric T. Peterson on weather Web Analytics is Easy or Hard.  I think it's more a matter of style than substance and the audience your trying to reach.

But if we were to summarize the positions of each writer - Avinash would be more like "ER" while Eric's style is more like "House".   

 

Question is, which one would you want to be treated by? 



Eric T. Peterson in Manhattan - February 7th, NYC - be there

Posted by Marshall on February 03, 2008 | Link It

Eric Peterson is going to be in Manhattan this Thursday, February 7th, at the Heartland Brewery and I'll be there.   Anyone interested in Web Analytics and Eric's work on Web Analytics Demystified should come - just click on this link to invite yourself and anyone else you want to - the more, the merrier.

Heartland Brewery

Web Analytics Wednesday will be held in New York on the following dates.

Eric Peterson, Web Analytics Guru, author of Web Analytics Demystified, The Big Book of KPIs, Web Site Measurement Hacks, moderator of the yahoo web analytics user forum and CEO/Founder of Web Analytics Demystified Inc., will be in midtown Manhattan Thursday (2/7/08) and is available for an impromptu WAW. The location is to be determined, as we are making arrangements. Let me know if you have any questions (JoelCollymore@hotmail.com)

Host:
Derek Monteverdi and Joel Collymore (Email)
Date:
Thursday, February 07, 2008 at 6:00 PM
Venue:
Heartland Brewery
Address:
1285 Sixth Ave at 51st Street, New York NY (Venue | Map | Group)
Sponsor:
Event sponsored by Opinionlab
Share:
Attendees:
31 people plan to attend, including Derek Monteverdi and Joel Collymore, andy.fisher, caccumanno, carmen.sutter, dana, dsuljoti, ereilly, Exinor, isacp, james.yoo, jessica.zorn, jhilliard, jkatzen, john.gill, kenn.gold, kevinmannion, kristin.ohalloran, lconwell, mdallatana, mkrebs, mmills, mspaeth, nicholas.r.law, now.seo, ophir.prusak, raquelpatillo, rblakeley, shari.rosen, sw, tmaddox, wexler

There's a lot more people in NYC into Web Analytics - this is a free event and free drinks - and maybe some food too.

Besides, I'll ask Eric T. Peterson about Visual Sciences - as I'm working with it now at Monster.com.