<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Social Media Monitoring Platforms on content about Social Media Week NYC 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2010/01/comparing-social-media-monitoring-platforms-on-content-about-social-media-week-nyc-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2010/01/comparing-social-media-monitoring-platforms-on-content-about-social-media-week-nyc-10/</link>
	<description>Web Analytics, Social Media and Search Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2010/01/comparing-social-media-monitoring-platforms-on-content-about-social-media-week-nyc-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3970</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmetricsguru.com/?p=6434#comment-3970</guid>
		<description>Marshall, loving these posts. First time I&#039;ve seen a head to head comparison like this. Very interesting to see how the coverage differs between them, especially when folk so readily claim they&#039;ve got &quot;millions of feeds, 10s of millions of blogs!&quot;  Really? All posting recently?  hmmm.....  

Would be interesting to line up their respective marketing lines and see if those stats claims line up with what you&#039;re seeing in actual coverage. If one has claims more feeds in a media type than the other, you&#039;d expect to see that reflected in more posts, right? 

As a separate thing, might be interesting to show what media types they each say they cover (forums, blogs, wikis, video sharing, etc)

great stuff

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall, loving these posts. First time I&#8217;ve seen a head to head comparison like this. Very interesting to see how the coverage differs between them, especially when folk so readily claim they&#8217;ve got &#8220;millions of feeds, 10s of millions of blogs!&#8221;  Really? All posting recently?  hmmm&#8230;..  </p>
<p>Would be interesting to line up their respective marketing lines and see if those stats claims line up with what you&#8217;re seeing in actual coverage. If one has claims more feeds in a media type than the other, you&#8217;d expect to see that reflected in more posts, right? </p>
<p>As a separate thing, might be interesting to show what media types they each say they cover (forums, blogs, wikis, video sharing, etc)</p>
<p>great stuff</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

