<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Web 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/02/the-death-of-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/02/the-death-of-web-20/</link>
	<description>Web Analytics, Social Media and Search Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:37:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Slobodzian</title>
		<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/02/the-death-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Slobodzian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmetricsguru.com/?p=4379#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>My own experience has been that Web 2.0 interest has morphed into the specific keywords &quot;Facebook&quot; and &quot;twitter&quot; among others. I think my observation supports your premise regarding hype and substance: these sites provide value to the people using them. I think that now people understand the concept of Web 2.0 and a participatory internet, they are drilling down on the most efficient and valuable ways for them to participate.

Also my observation: If a broader term were to replace &quot;web 2.0&quot; it may be &quot;social media&quot;. That is what I am seeing more of in blogs and news. Google is seeing the same trend: http://www.google.com/trends?q=web+2.0%2C+social+media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own experience has been that Web 2.0 interest has morphed into the specific keywords &#8220;Facebook&#8221; and &#8220;twitter&#8221; among others. I think my observation supports your premise regarding hype and substance: these sites provide value to the people using them. I think that now people understand the concept of Web 2.0 and a participatory internet, they are drilling down on the most efficient and valuable ways for them to participate.</p>
<p>Also my observation: If a broader term were to replace &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; it may be &#8220;social media&#8221;. That is what I am seeing more of in blogs and news. Google is seeing the same trend: <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=web+2.0%2C+social+media" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/trends?q=web+2.0%2C+social+media</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Ambrozek</title>
		<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/02/the-death-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Ambrozek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmetricsguru.com/?p=4379#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>Marshall, Interesting post but I want to hear more of you thinking about:

&quot;..but still - to me, the organizers of conferences, like Web 2.0 Expo need to start changing the focus away from hype and into reality.&quot;

What is the reality beyond Web 2.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall, Interesting post but I want to hear more of you thinking about:</p>
<p>&#8220;..but still &#8211; to me, the organizers of conferences, like Web 2.0 Expo need to start changing the focus away from hype and into reality.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is the reality beyond Web 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KP</title>
		<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/02/the-death-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmetricsguru.com/?p=4379#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>&quot;Internet&quot; might be a good next name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Internet&#8221; might be a good next name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: priyanka d</title>
		<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/02/the-death-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-2911</link>
		<dc:creator>priyanka d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmetricsguru.com/?p=4379#comment-2911</guid>
		<description>maybe web 2.0 searches are on a decline cause people are now aware about it so not too many who are searching for &#039;web 2.0&#039; but there could be an increase of more specific keywords related to web 2.0
What d&#039;ya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe web 2.0 searches are on a decline cause people are now aware about it so not too many who are searching for &#8216;web 2.0&#8242; but there could be an increase of more specific keywords related to web 2.0<br />
What d&#8217;ya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/02/the-death-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmetricsguru.com/?p=4379#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>Good counter-argument.  I wonder that when the economy comes back around and the industry latches back on to a buzz term, will it be web 2.0 still or web 3.0? More conference names changes :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good counter-argument.  I wonder that when the economy comes back around and the industry latches back on to a buzz term, will it be web 2.0 still or web 3.0? More conference names changes <img src='http://www.webmetricsguru.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
