What Google Giveth it can take away - watch the results - HitWise

Posted by Marshall on February 13, 2008 | Link It

It may not be common knowledge yet, but all Know More Media's blogs, including this one, was hit by a Google Penalty (but it's not clear, exactly why) that impacted traffic quite a bit.   While I love wearing my Google Shirts - lately I've had a harder time feeling good about doing so (read The real problem with Google Rankings and let me know what you think). 

On the other hand, I don't run the advertising or web templates on webmetricsguru.com and I suspect the penalty was related to that and/or something about the interlinking.   While the situation is being worked on, I also asked fellow WAA Board Member and Google Analytics Avanglist, Avinash Kaushik, for help.   A couple of people are working on this issue - first is figuring out what the penalty was about (and I'll write my next post about that) and the other - is what to do about - in case you actually figure out why it was caused.

But this post is not about that issue - it's about a post on HitWise that graphiclly shows what happens when Google, for whatever reason, decides to reduce a site's ranking - very interesting post about What happens if your site gets 'blacklisted' by Google?

Well, look at where insurance comparison website GoCompare.com was ranked at last month, before it got the Google Penalty.

"…Before it fell out with Google, this was good news for GoCompare as the comparison site had established itself as the top website within Google’s natural / organic listings for the term. However, since being ‘blacklisted’ it has dropped down the listings and, at the time of writing, is currently on the seventh page of listings – i.e. well outside of the top 10.

Google search results for car insurance go compare screenshot.png

 

Then, after the drop in rankings - looks what happens

 

UK Internet searches for car insurance and traffic to go compare  gocompare 2007 2008 chart.png

GoCompare received only 2.31% of all search term traffic from the term ‘car insurance’ during the week ending 9th February, which is an 87% decrease from week ending 26th Jan when it held the #1 natural position on Google. However, as we see from this chart, searches for ‘car insurance’ remained constant during this period.

I'll spend another post on The Analytics Guru titled The real problem with Google Rankings -  I gave my honest opinion of the real issues involved with traffic drops related to search engine rankings - I hope you read it and keep coming back there to read more.



4 Responses

These are the current comments for "What Google Giveth it can take away - watch the results - HitWise"

02/14/08 @ 2:08 pm

Hi Marshall, I already gave some concrete advice for Know More Media sites a few weeks ago at http://www.seo-scoop.com/2008/01/24/matt-cutts-why-am-i-still-being-punished/#comment-3980

That’s the first place I’d start.



02/14/08 @ 2:30 pm

We had the same issue happening here with a “borrow money” site. One strange thing I can still not explain, the conversions became better at the drop, extremely better…



Marshall Sponder
02/15/08 @ 8:00 am

Thanks Matt,

Actually, I read the entire thread of http://www.seo-scoop.com/2008/01/24/matt-cutts-why-am-i-still-being-punished/#comment-3980
including all the advice you gave (which is really great) and I’ll post about this on http://www.theanalyticsguru.com later on today - but what I’m going to say, more or less is this:

There’s a alot of responsibility being asked of site content owners just now to police their paid links (with large properties like Know More Media - figuring out all the possible places where one could have an “offending” paid link might be next to impossible task - esp when there’s over a hundred blogs and 2+ years of content to go through.

Yet, Google seems to know exactly where the offending links are! And it will pull the entire KMM network out of the index, more or less, if it finds just one or two examples.

Something definitely needs to be re-thought out here.

What Google is attempting to do (clean up the index - get better organic search results) is great - but HOW they do it - the way they apply penalties, and a process to appeal any change that’s perceived to be negative - none of that seems to be in place in a way that makes it easy to have 2 WAY interchange.

So, until Google can create a process that allows 2 way interchange - I believe they should suspend all penalties against all the sites - not withstanding that a few spammers will be “pardoned” as well.

You have measure the “cost” and “benefits” of making the kind of sweeping changes that Google has been doing with paid link - page rank passing - and I think when you do this you’ll find the cost outweighs the benefits.

I’ll have more to say later today at http://www.theanalyticsguru.com

marshall



02/16/08 @ 12:57 am

Here’s the promised post on The Analytics Guru that goes into Matt Cutt’s suggestions - Google’s Penalty or “Good n’ Plenty” http://theanalyticsguru.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/googles-penalty-or-good-n-plenty/

I formed my own opinion on this, btw.



Post a Response

Name (required)

Email (required, not published)

Website (optional)

Note: The following tags are approved for comments on this blog:
<a href=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <del> <strong>